Press release -
Ground Breaking Development of World’s First CurativeTreatment of Intractable Hepatocellular Carcinoma Path to Establishment of Standard Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma - Kindai University
In a world first, the treatment has been proven to be nearly twice as effective at prolonging life as the current standard treatment, TACE (which was created in the 1970s). Further, it is an extremely effective treatment method for the disease, with the study showing just under 20% of patients experienced complete elimination of the cancer and are still living to date without any treatment. This clinical study was collaborative -research carried out between 2008 and 2018 cross-institutionally, with a total of eight -institutions (see below for details); seven domestic and one in Hong Kong. As per this announcement, these results change the face of the medical care world, with the development and establishment of a treatment for a previously incurable disease with no standard treatment.
1.Highlights of Study
- Establishment of a radical cure for multiple and/or large liver cancers - previously for which there was no standard treatment
- Pre-administration of lenvatinib followed by TACE treatment elucidated to prolong life in late phase intermediate stage liver cancer patients
- Positioned to be the new standard treatment for liver cancer which reaches the intractable stage.
Comparison of overall survival rates between LEN-TACE patients and those who only received TACE
2.Content of the Research
Hepatocellular carcinoma is the 5th leading cause of cancer deaths in Japanese people, an intractable disease which annually kills approximately 28,000 people. Hepatocellular carcinoma is divided into 5 stages: 1. Early stage liver cancer (3 nodules or less and/or 3cm or less), 2. Medium size and multiple nodules(intermediate-stage, early) 3. Large or multiple nodules throughout whole liver (intermediate-stage, advanced), 4. Advanced liver cancer (vascularinvasion, extrahepatic metastasis), 5. Terminal stage.
Surgical resection and use of radiofrequency ablation are the established treatment methods for early stage 1 liver cancer; for stage 2, TACE is the standard treatment. In stage 4 with advanced liver cancer - vascular invasion and extrahepatic metastasis - molecular targeted drugs are the standard treatment method, with clinical trials of immune checkpoint inhibitors also being extensively conducted. However, for most patients, who are in stage 3 with multiple and/or large HCCs, the effectiveness of the standard treatment, TACE, invented in the 1970’s, is limited, and many experience reoccurrences and move to advanced stage or terminal stage liver cancer. Although it is an important stage of liver cancer, until now there has been no established standard treatment. Therefore, the development of a treatment for this stage of liver cancer is an urgent task for liver cancer researchers around the world and has long been the largest theme, but it has remained an unresolved challenge until now.
In this study, the molecular targeted drug, lenvatinib, which is usually used only for advanced liver cancer, was first used as the initial therapy for this stage of liver cancer. By using this treatment, the following hypothesis was proven to be true:
1) Induces tumor shrinkage and necrosis
2) The irregular thickness (both thick and thin) of the blood vessels of the tumors are restored to the blood vessel diameter of normal blood vessels
3) Acts to uniformly distribute anti-cancer agents and embolic substances in the tumor interior added later
4) By using TACE at the time which the molecular targeted drug exerts its maximum effect, recurrence and metastasis is prevented by suppression of angiogenic factors (factors that cause tumor growth / invasive metastasis) induced by the TACE.
Further, by administering the molecular targeted drug, lenvatinib, to patients of this stage of liver cancer, and following it up by adding TACE (combined LEN-TACE sequential treatment), compared to just using TACE, life was prolonged by approximately double. In addition, it was found that the risk of death was reduced by approximately 52% (HR*4 0.48, p<0.01).
As it has been proven to prolong life, it is foreseen that this new treatment will significantly change the treatment strategy of liver cancer globally, and become the standard of care.
3. About Publication
Research paper title: Lenvatinib as an Initial Treatment in Patients with Intermediate-
stage Hepatocellular Carcinoma Beyond up-to-seven Criteria and Child-Pugh A Liver Function: A Proof-of-Concept Study
Journal name: Cancers (IF:6.162)
Co-authors: Masatoshi Kudo1, Kazuomi Ueshima1, Stephan Chan2, Tomohiro Minami 1, Hirokazu Chishina1, Tomoko Aoki1, Masahiro Takita1, Satoru Hagiwara1, Yasunori Minami1, Hiroshi Ida1, Mamoru Takenaka1, Toshiharu Sakurai1, Tomohiro Watanabe1, Masahiro Morita3, Chikara Ogawa3, Yoshiyuki Wada4, Masafumi Ikeda5, Hiroshi Ishii6, 7, Namiki Izumi8, Naoshi Nishida1
1Kindai University, Faculty of Medicine(Department of – Gastroenterology and Hepatology), 2The Chinese University of Hong Kong - Translational Oncology, 3Takamatsu Red Cross Hospital - Department of Digestive Organs, 4National Hospital Organization Kyushu Medical Center – Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, 5National Cancer Center Hospital East – Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Oncology (Internal Medicine), 6Cancer Institute Hospital – Department of Gastroenterology, 7Chiba Cancer Center – Clinical Research Center, 8Musashino Red Cross Hospital – Department of Gastroenterology
4. Details of Research
The molecular targeted drug lenvatinib has, in the 10 years to 2017, been shown to be the first drug to be non-inferior to the only standard drug, sorafenib for advanced HCC until now, in prolonging life. The details of the results of the clinical trial were published in ‘Lancet’ in 2018 (Kudo M, et al. Lancet 2018). Currently this drug is approved worldwide as the first choice of drug for advanced liver cancer, of course in Asia, but also in the Americas and Europe etc., and therefore its use is widespread. Further, lenvatinib not only showed greater effectiveness in prolonging life in advanced liver cancer patients, but also excelled for tumor reduction and necrosis; objective response rate (ORR*5) was 40.6%, indicating excellent effectiveness as an anti-tumor agent. Conversely, TACE, the standard treatment for intermediate-stage liver cancer just before the advanced stage (multiple nodules/large-sized cancers without vascular invasion/extrahepatic metastasis) has poor effectiveness, with reoccurrence of cancers leading to liver function worsening and accelerating death; many cases of patients becoming terminally ill or progressing to more advanced stages of liver cancer even after treatment with TACE have been seen. This stage of the disease can be said to be an illness that causes suffering worldwide, with no standard treatment, it is an incurable cancer.
Prof. Kudo and his team focused on the superior tumor reduction and necrosis effectiveness of lenvatinib. Lenvatinib was purposely pre-administered before TACE treatment at the stage of multiple nodules/large-sized cancers, without the presence of vascular invasion/extrahepatic metastasis, and then TACE was performed. The hypothesis that pre-administration of lenvatinib, followed by TACE, (LEN-TACE sequential treatment), would enhance the effectiveness of the TACE was stated. At the time there were few researchers around the world with such a hypothesis. To verify this hypothesis, between 2008 and 2018, the research team analyzed 37 patients at this stage of liver cancer, administering lenvatinib as an initial treatment. The methodology used was a comparison of the treatment effectiveness with 139 patients who had TACE carried out during the same period. Further, the results of propensity score matching*6, a statistical method to unify the backgrounds of patients was used; 30 cases of lenvatinib pre-administration followed by TACE and 60 cases of only TACE therapy were extracted, with comparisons made between objective response rate (ORR), progression of liver function deterioration (ALBI score*7), progression-free survival (PFS*8), and overall survival (OS*9).
The results showed the group who were pre-administered lenvatinib had a much higher ORR of 73.3%, compared to 33.3% for the group who had only TACE (Odds ratio 5.29, <0.001), deterioration of liver function was also significantly lower (p<0.01), further, PFS was dramatically better in the lenvatinib pre-administered group (16mths vs 3mths, hazard ratio 0.19, p<0.001). In addition, there were four patients in the lenvatinib pre-administration group that experienced complete disappearance of all cancers and were completely cured, with follow up observations showing they were healthy with no treatment. Therefore, this treatment is considered to be a groundbreaking new cure, even for some advanced liver cancers (multiple nodules/large sized cancers). These results mark the announcement of the development of a ground-breaking world first, and will change medical treatment strategy globally by providing a treatment where no prior standard existed.
*1 Molecular target drug
Different from previous anticancer drugs that also cause harm to normal functioning cells, molecular targeted drugs are drugs that only target the specific molecules that are involved in proliferation of cancer cells and suppress their activity. In the case of liver cancer, approved medicines include the following four: lenvatinib (Lenvima), sorafenib (Nexavar), regorafenib (Stivarga) and ramucirumab (Cyramza).
*2 Transcatheter arterial embolization therapy (TACE)
The liver gains nourishment through two blood vessels; the hepatic artery and the portal vein. As liver cancer cells gain nutrition and 100% of their oxygen from the hepatic artery, TACE is a method of using a catheter to completely block the hepatic artery, thus killing the cancer cells. If the size or number of cancers is small, this method is effective, but if the cancer size is large or numerous, the disadvantages of this method are, as well as it being difficult to have the catheter close to the tumor, it also to an extent kills the surrounding normally-functioning cells, decreasing liver function.
*3 Immune checkpoint inhibitor
When cancer forms in a living organism, lymphocytes should be activated to attack the cancer cells to try to kill them. However, when this reaction occurs, cancer cells release a molecule called PD-L1, and by binding this molecule to the PD-1 on the surface of lymphocytes, they are able to evade immune cell attack, successively proliferate and spread to and invade other locations. When antibodies that bind to PD-1 or PD-L1 are administered, the cancer cells’ avoidance mechanism (against the immune response) is blocked, and lymphocytes can again attack the cancer cells. This mechanism was discovered by Prof. Honjo of Kyoto University in 2018 and he was awarded a Nobel Prize in the field of Physiology or Medicine.
*4 Hazard Ratio
“Hazard Ratio” is a term used in statistics, it is used to describe a method used to objectively compare the relative degree of risk in clinical trials. It can be abbreviated to HR.
When investigating a new treatment, HR is used to compare it to the standard treatment. A hazard ratio of 1 shows that the two treatment methods are not different. Less than 1 shows that the new treatment is more effective than the standard treatment, with the lower the number showing greater effectiveness. For example, if a clinical study comparing the effectiveness of medicine A to medicine B results in 0.94, medicine A is deemed to have reduced the risk by 6% compared to medicine B. The HR of OS in this clinical study was 0.48, therefore it can be stated that the new treatment method reduces the risk by 52% of death.
*5 Objective Response Rate (ORR)
A commonly used standard indicator to evaluate the results of treatment using anticancer drugs, by comparing the size of the tumor before and after treatment. Tumor reduction (or necrosis of tumor) of 30% or more is deemed to be ‘partial response’ (PR), and 100% complete disappearance or complete necrosis of the tumor is called ‘complete response’ (CR). The efficacy is measured by adding the CR and PR of the whole mass, with a higher number corresponding to greater efficacy.
*6 Propensity score matching
A method of statistically proving clinical usefulness. In order to prove that hypothesis (e.g. A treatment method is better than the standard one) is of the highest importance, a prospective randomized control trial (RCT) is the method with the highest level of evidence. However, the method with the next highest level of evidence is this one, created in 1983. That is, it is a statistical analysis method recommended in recent years as a so-called “method for eliminating selection bias” by making uniform the extraneous factors related to the survival to both groups.
*7 ALBI score (Albumin-Bilirubin score)
Conventionally, Child-Pugh Classification and Child-Pugh Score have been used as indicators of hepatic functional reserve. ALBI Score is a more accurate and objective indicator than Child-Pugh Classification as it is calculated using only albumin and bilirubin. In recentyears, ALBI Score has become more commonly used than Child-Pugh Score. It has also been adopted into the protocols of the Liver Cancer Study Group of Japan. Although the calculations are complex, most hospitals have adopted systems that automatically calculate the value and display them to electronic medical records, making the process extremely simple.
*8 Progression-free survival (PFS)
A commonly used indicator used for the evaluation of the results of treatments of anticancer drugs. It is defined as the period from beginning a study or treatment start date to confirmation of disease progression or death. Often the median is used as the representative figure.
*9 Overall Survival (OS)
A commonly used indicator used for the evaluation of the results of treatments of anticancer drugs. It is defined as the time from the registration date of the study or treatment start date of the target patient, to confirmation of death. Often the median is used as the representative figure.